blog · 5 cornerstones · 17 satellites
The company brain argument, in twenty-two pieces.
Five cornerstone essays make the case for team AI as a category. Seventeen satellite essays support and extend it. Each post is built around a single argument and the visual that proves it.
showing 22 / 22
Cornerstones
the 5-part argumentSatellites
17 supporting essays- Satellite 06Why your team keeps re debating the same architectural decisionsMay 4, 20267 min
- Satellite 07The hidden cost of senior engineer departureMay 2, 20267 min
- Satellite 08Glean vs Pulse, an honest comparison for software teamsApr 30, 20268 min
- Satellite 09Why Notion AI alone is not enough for engineering teamsApr 28, 20267 min
- Satellite 10When does a software team need a company brain?Apr 26, 20267 min
- Satellite 11The trust problem with enterprise AI toolsApr 24, 20268 min
- Satellite 12Five questions your AI tool should answer with sourcesApr 22, 20267 min
- Satellite 13How a 50 person engineering team should evaluate AI knowledge toolsApr 20, 20269 min
- Satellite 14Beyond chat: why the next generation of AI tools will be proactiveApr 18, 20268 min
- Satellite 15The Anthropic Agent Skills standardApr 16, 20267 min
- Satellite 16How to onboard new engineers in weeks, not monthsApr 14, 20267 min
- Satellite 17Why human authored AI workflows always go staleApr 12, 20267 min
- Satellite 18Atlassian Rovo vs Pulse, choosing team AI for the modern stackApr 10, 20268 min
- Satellite 19The new shadow IT, managing personal AI agentsApr 8, 20268 min
- Satellite 20Calibrated confidence, why your AI tool should tell you when it is unsureApr 6, 20267 min
- Satellite 21Who keeps your company's facts true?May 31, 20266 min
- Satellite 22Your team's knowledge doesn't fit seven boxesJun 3, 20266 min
See the argument in product.
Every essay describes a product invariant Pulse already enforces. The live demo is walkable end to end without signup.